argument top image

Is animal testing ethical?
Back to question

Animals are part of God's creation

In many major religions, animals are considered as part of God's creation. Therefore, humans have special responsibilities towards them. Inflicting harm on animals is unethical and forbidden by God.

The Argument

From the perspective of religious ethics, animal welfare is of utmost importance because animals are part of God’s creation. This importance becomes obvious in the very beginning of the Torah. The first commandments given by the Lord to humans and animals concern the welfare and survival of animals and human stewardship responsibilities toward them. Similarly, the Bible emphasizes kindness to animals, which is required in the Ten Commandments.[1] In terms of cruelty to animals, Judaism has strict laws. An entire code of laws (“tsa’ar ba’alei hayim,” the requirement “to prevent the suffering of living creatures”) mandates that animals be treated with compassion. Christianity also forbids cruelty to animals since they are created by God. Two disciples quote Jesus as saying that God loves even the “lowliest” of creatures. In Islam, any cruelty toward an animal is considered a sin.[1] According to Jewish tradition, animals are capable of developing spiritually. Jews believe that someone who neglects animals cannot be good in God's eyes.[2] This belief is also seen in Buddhism. Buddhists try to do as little harm as possible to animals, avoid any jobs connected with the killing of animals, and respect animals and humans equally. In Buddhism, both humans and non-human animals are capable of reaching Nirvana, the highest state of well-being.[3] To apply these religious teachings to animal testing, using animals for research purposes becomes unethical. Inflicting any harm on animals regardless of the purpose is intolerable.

Counter arguments

Some Jewish experts believe that it is a misreading of Torah literature to speak of animal rights. Rabbi Moshe Tendler (a professor of Talmudic law and chairman of the biology department at Yeshiva University, and a leading expert on Jewish medical ethics) argues that animals were given in this world to serve man, and that hierarchy is a fundamental belief in Torah Judaism. There are no animal rights, but human obligations, which are to use animals for the benefit of man.[4] Regarding the use of animals in medical experimentation or organ transplant, Tendler suggests that the greatest mitzvah a person can do is to use an animal to save a human life. He further argues that the conditions for animals in medical research laboratories today fulfill Jewish injunctions about the humane treatment of animals.[4]



Rejecting the premises


This page was last edited on Wednesday, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:24 UTC

Explore related arguments