argument top image

How does coronavirus compare to other pandemics? Show more Show less
Back to question

COVID-19 has been devastating, affecting people across the world and killing thousands. However, it is far from the first pandemic of its kind. From the Spanish flu to the bubonic plague, throughout history pandemics have killed huge amounts of the population. Is the coronavirus pandemic the worst in history? Or have previous pandemics been worse?

The bubonic plague is the worst pandemic in history Show more Show less

The bubonic plague killed more people than any other pandemic in history.
< (3 of 6) Next position >

The bubonic plague killed more people than any other

The bubonic plague killed roughly 200 million people in the 14th century.
< (1 of 2) Next argument >

The Argument

The bubonic plague, or Black Death, emerged in the 14th century. Originally spreading to humans from rats, the pandemic killed roughly 200 million people, about half of Europe's population.[1] It took over 200 years for the continent's population to recover. This places Black Death as the deadliest pandemic in history by a significant margin - second place belonging to smallpox, which killed 50 million people.[1] The disease was also terrifyingly contagious and deadly. Simply touching a sick person was said to be enough to infect someone else, and people who were healthy in the evening could be dead by the morning.[2] The Black Death was unprecedented in its deadliness, in a way that certainly has not been seen since.

Counter arguments

Premises

[P1] The Black Death killed many more people than any other pandemic. [P2] It is therefore by far the worst pandemic.

Rejecting the premises

References

  1. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/history-of-pandemics-deadliest/
  2. https://www.history.com/topics/middle-ages/black-death#section_6

Vote

Not sure yet? Read more ↑

Discuss

This page was last edited on Wednesday, 1 Apr 2020 at 14:19 UTC

Explore related arguments