argument top image

Is Taylor Swift a gay icon? Show more Show less
Back to question

Taylor Swift is a talented musician and songwriter, one of the most famous people in the world, and has built a net worth in the hundreds of millions of dollars through her immensely personal songs. Her millions of 'Swifties' are as fierce as they are loyal. But has Taylor built the same kind of following in the LGBT community? Could we consider Taylor Swift to be one of the modern day gay icons?

Who cares if Taylor Swift is a gay icon? Show more Show less

Taylor Swift has a loyal fan base that will follow her no matter what cause she decides on. LGBTQ is a good start but why not support all worthy causes?
< (3 of 3)

Many celebrities engage in activism, but often their work is misinformed and causes more harm than good

Taylor Swift’s platform, reach, and support - although influential - do not exalt her to the status of a “gay icon,” especially since there are non-celebrities doing the same work, and far more sustainably.
< (2 of 2)

The Argument

According to a 2015 article in The Guardian, celebrity activism has become far more popular over the years. So popular, the article claims, that superstardom seems to require some sort of alignment with a cause or even an entire country in need. Celebrities are capable of shedding light on an issue previously forgotten; in many ways, a sole celebrity could be the catalyst for profound social change.[1] Yet, The Guardian explains that celebrities are perhaps the least effective at implementing tangible change, so if politicians are not listening, then the celebrities will have gained a whole lot of publicity for effectively no benefit to the cause they support. In fact, there is a real possibility of negative impact. According to The Guardian, celebrities like Ben Affleck and Nicole Richie supported Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which would ask U.S. companies to reveal whether or not they were using materials produced in conflict-ridden areas, otherwise known as “conflict materials.” While this seems like a beneficial use of their celebrity platforms, this act caused “tens of thousands” of miners to lose their jobs and forced them to look into illegal work. According to Alex de Waal, activism should be involved with “local people.” Collaboration and acknowledgment of local expertise is key in order to understand the nuances of a problem; money and a platform is not superior to experience.[1] In the wake of the horrific death of George Floyd, Jordan Coley of The New Yorker writes, “A #blacklivesmatter post of Jennifer Lopez’s Instagram page reaches an audience larger than those of most regional televised stations.” Coley’s truthful and I-need-to-read-that-again statement to shed light on the power of celebrity platforms reveals just how wise it is for superstars to involve themselves in activism and take responsibility for their influence. Yet, according to Coley, many have posted messages after the murder of George Floyd that do not necessarily seek to galvanize or make any tangible move to support bail funds or Floyd’s family, but rather are intended to make their own brands clear. During Black Out Tuesday, many mistakenly used the #blacklivesmatter hashtag and scrambled valuable information for activists and protesters. Their platforms are massive; this means celebrities can do great good if they use their social media for active engagement rather than brand-building.[2] While Taylor Swift released a powerful song “You Need to Calm Down,” in support of LGBTQIA+ rights, she would have to do far more with her platform to be considered a “gay icon.”[2]

Counter arguments

According to Global Citizen, while celebrities are entirely capable of using their platforms for self-serving initiatives and many often do, there have been a myriad of figures who have not only financially supported important causes, but have made the effort to initiate tangible change and even see it through to completion. In 2017, superstar Rihanna spent a significant amount of time educating her fanbase on the damage caused by Hurricane Maria. She also designed the Fenty Beauty line, providing accessible makeup to all skin tones, an unjust rarity in the beauty industry.[3] Fenty has been revolutionary and she chose to shut down all sales on Black Out Tuesday, in order to demand justice for George Floyd and other victims of police brutality in the U.S. She made a statement on Instagram to her fanbase, far more like a call to action, explaining that neither she nor her brand stands by the rampant racism and violence in the U.S.[4] A Vox article highlights the power of Swift's lyrics in “You Need to Calm Down.” A significant portion of her fanbase is young and her support of the queer community is not only influential but uplifting for many of her supporters. Taylor Swift has at least recently demonstrated substantial activism for the LGBTQIA+ community, writing an open letter to a senator and using her platform to educate her fanbase which is full of a myriad of political leanings.[5]

Proponents

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

  1. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/jul/10/celebrity-activism-africa-live-aid
  2. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/i-take-responsibility-and-the-limits-of-celebrity-activism
  3. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/celebrities-impact-top-2017-activism/
  4. https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a32741399/rihanna-shuts-down-brands-blackout-tuesday/
  5. https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/6/17/18682588/taylor-swift-you-need-to-calm-down-gay-anthem

Vote

Not sure yet? Read more ↑

Discuss

This page was last edited on Friday, 10 Jul 2020 at 14:39 UTC

Explore related arguments