Home Categories About
argument top image
Does Esports have a legitimate claim to being a sport? Does Esports have a legitimate claim to being a sport?
Yes, Esports has a legitimate claim at being a sport Yes, Esports has a legitimate claim at being a sport
No, Esports does not have a legitimate claim at being a sport No, Esports does not have a legitimate claim at being a sport
It does not matter if Esports is a sport It does not matter if Esports is a sport
Esports involves skill Esports involves skill
Esports is recognised as a sport in multiple countries Esports is recognised as a sport in multiple countries
Classing Esports as a sport would benefit Esports athletes Classing Esports as a sport would benefit Esports athletes
Esports athletes train just as hard as traditional athletes Esports athletes train just as hard as traditional athletes
Esports does not involve physical exertion or effort Esports does not involve physical exertion or effort
Esports does not offer the physical health benefits of traditional sports Esports does not offer the physical health benefits of traditional sports
Esports has benefits beyond traditional sports Esports has benefits beyond traditional sports
There is no universal definition of 'sport' There is no universal definition of 'sport'
Debate Mini Map

Does Esports have a legitimate claim to being a sport?
Back to question

No, Esports does not have a legitimate claim at being a sport

< (2 of 3) Next position >

Esports does not involve physical exertion or effort

The Oxford definition of 'sport' is "an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment." Esports does not fit this definition.
< (1 of 2) Next argument >

The Argument

Counter arguments

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

In the Wild

This page was last edited on Wednesday, 6 Jan 2021 at 20:47 UTC

Explore related arguments