argument top image

< Back to question What are the advantages and disadvantages of globalization? Show more Show less

Proponents of globalization say it improves citizens' lives via the distribution of jobs, capital, and technology across borders, promoting peace through deeper economic ties between nations. Others claim the globalized movement of goods and people has fuelled inequality, environmental degradation, and deepened economic inequalities.

Globalization is bad Show more Show less

Globalization has fuelled inequality, eroded worker protections and contributed to environmental degradation.
< (2 of 2)

Globalization leads to reduced public revenues

The free movement of labour allows companies to easily relocate to tax havens.
economics globalization politics
< (2 of 5) Next argument >

Vote

Not sure yet? Read more before voting ↓

Proponents


Context

Globalization increases corporate mobility. This means companies are more responsive to tax hikes and increases. As a result, they prevent governments from raising tax revenues through corporation tax and seek out tax havens as a cost-cutting measure.

The Argument

In a hyper-globalized world, companies are highly mobile and easily able to uproot operations and relocate across international borders. This makes them highly sensitive to tax increases. If a company based in the UK believes it can make substantial tax savings by relocating operations to Ireland, there are very few mechanisms preventing it from doing so.[1] This mobility might prevent nations from introducing higher levels of corporate tax. Not wanting to risk an exodus of jobs and industries, governments might keep taxes on businesses very low, or introduce more regressive taxes like a value-added tax or a goods and services tax that place a larger burden on poorer demographics in an attempt to recover public revenue.

Counter arguments

Globalization does not decrease public revenue, it increases it. Globalization increases the average global income, bringing more money into the public coffers through income taxes. Prior to the first wave of globalization, global GDP per capita growth rates were marginal. Following the first wave of globalization, global GDP growth rates have soared. This directly translates to public revenue through corporation tax (however low), income tax, value-added tax, goods and services taxes, import taxes, property taxes etc.[2]

Premises

[P1] Globalization increases corporate mobility. [P2] This makes corporations more sensitive to tax hikes. [P3] To avoid losing jobs, governments won't raise corporation tax and might, in some cases, lower it. [P4] This results in stagnating or declining public revenues.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P3] Corporation tax is not the only way to increase public revenue. [Rejecting P4] Globalization increases GDP per capita, which means higher public revenues through other taxes.

References

  1. https://www.nber.org/papers/w14664
  2. https://ourworldindata.org/is-globalization-an-engine-of-economic-development

This page was last edited on Wednesday, 22 Jul 2020 at 09:20 UTC

Explore related arguments