Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

Who is James Bond? Show more Show less

From the beginning of the James Bond movie franchise in 1962, 007 has proved to be a long-lasting cultural icon. The spy for the U.K. Secret Service has now starred in 26 movies, accruing many high-tech gadgets and charming huge amounts of women as he goes. But who is James Bond? Is he a hero? A villain? A symbol of a time gone by? Or totally irrelevant?

Who cares who James Bond is? Show more Show less

Materially, it means nothing to ask who James Bond is.
< Previous (4 of 4 Positions)

James Bond is just a code name

James Bond is not any one man, but a code name used by multiple agents.
< Previous (1 of 3 Arguments) Next >

Context

The Argument

James Bond isn't an individual. Rather, 'James Bond' is a moniker given to all agents who assume the 007 identity. Just look at Judi Dench, who plays the same character in the franchise across different iterations of Bond. Another piece of evidence is George Lazenby's Bond stating in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service that “this never happened to the other guy.”[1] Since Bond is built around a code name, there are no intrinsic qualities to him as a character. The question of who James Bond is is pointless, as the answer is no-one.

Counter arguments

Framing

Premises

[P1] James Bond is not a man, but a codename. [P2] Therefore, asking who James Bond is is futile.

Rejecting the premises

Proponents

Further Reading

References

  1. https://www.cinelinx.com/movie-news/movie-stuff/is-james-bond-just-a-code-name-handed-down-to-different-agents/

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Tuesday, 3 Mar 2020 at 12:24 UTC