argument top image

Should universities no-platform controversial speakers? Show more Show less
Back to question

Universities are meant to be the burgeoning hubs of idea exchange, yet denying controversial speakers a platform on campuses has become increasingly acceptable. Are there good reasons to no-platform inflammatory speakers?

Yes, Universities should be able to no-platform speakers Show more Show less

No-platforming is legitimate and beneficial
(1 of 2) Next position >

Neutrality is not an option

Universities need to take a definitive stance that condemn hate and all forms of discrimination and the rhetoric that is used to support it
< (5 of 5) Next argument >

The Argument

Counter arguments

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

This page was last edited on Thursday, 29 Oct 2020 at 15:25 UTC

Explore related arguments