The UK controversial statues debate is an opportunity to think about how we look at history
We rarely reflect on the role of history: how we understand it, and how that understanding shapes the present. This debate is an opportunity to do precisely that.
< (5 of 7) Next argument >
The light on the controversial statues that many have removed, or want to be removed, actually opens the opportunity for us really think about how we look at history. The people depicted by said statues have unarguably been complacent in some horrible activities. However we can not change the past, nor can we hide from it. All that we can do is learn from it, and think about how to learn from it and view it. Even if the statues are removed, it would be far from enough. That would just be hiding history, it’s important to figure out how dishonoring a person from history, would serve the present, or how it might demand equality. Also, if statues are removed, what about the positive deads that person did to receive the recognition in the first place? Or do we view the deeds in a different light, from the difference in historical and social perspective? This issue is much more than deciding whether or not to remove statues, or it could be.
Rejecting the premises