Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

< Back to question Should sex education be taught in schools? Show more Show less

With the increasing ubiquity of sexual images, teenagers receive a constant stream of sexual imagery and information. But whose responsibility is it to equip children and teens with the necessary knowledge to form attitudes about sex, relationships and intimacy? Is it the parents'? Or should educators provide teens with comprehensive sex education classes in schools?

Sex education should be taught in schools Show more Show less

School is where children hone their decision-making abilities and gain the skills to interpret the world around them. Sex should be a part of that education.
< (2 of 2)

Sex education promotes healthy living

We teach the importance of exercise, a healthy diet, and good oral hygiene in schools. Why wouldn't we also teach good practices for sexual health?
< (4 of 6) Next argument >


Schools already teach children about the importance of a healthy lifestyle. We teach them on the dangers of alcohol and drugs, nutrition, the importance of exercise, and oral hygiene.

The Argument

Sexual education is a matter of public health. Students must be informed of the dangers of unprotected sex and the measures they can take to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Morality and ethics aside, teaching teens about contraception is a must for promoting a healthy lifestyle. [1] The US is in the grip of an STD epidemic. 20 million new STD cases emerge in 15-24-year-olds every year, costing around $16 billion annually in healthcare costs and pose a major threat to the individual’s long-term reproductive health. Failure to teach sex education as part of a comprehensive health program in schools leaves them vulnerable to disease and fertility problems in later life. [2]

Counter arguments

Sex education is not simply a matter of public health and attempting to teach it in this way is damaging and dangerous to the sexual development of young adults. An amoral approach that teaches sex education as part of a public health program separates human sexuality from its connection with love and emotional affection. This can lead teens to behave in a more promiscuous way. It can also inhibit their ability to detect sexual abuse and identify grooming behaviour.[3] Themes like love, value and admiration must be a central component of any sex education. These, unlike alcohol, tobacco, nutrition and exercise, are not matters related to public health. They are part of the emotional and moral development of a child and therefore fall under the educational purview of the parent, not the school.


[P1] Schools have a responsibility to teach matters of public health and the importance of a healthy lifestyle. [P2] Sex education is a public health matter. [P3] Therefore, sex education should be taught in schools.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P2] Sex education is not a public health matter. It is a moral and ethical matter. [Rejecting P3] Moral and ethical education is the parents' responsibility. Therefore, sex education is the parents' responsibility.




This page was last edited on Monday, 20 Jan 2020 at 09:45 UTC


Not sure yet? Read more before voting ↑

Explore related arguments