argument top image

How does coronavirus compare to other pandemics? Show more Show less
Back to question

COVID-19 has been devastating, affecting people across the world and killing thousands. However, it is far from the first pandemic of its kind. From the Spanish flu to the bubonic plague, throughout history pandemics have killed huge amounts of the population. Is the coronavirus pandemic the worst in history? Or have previous pandemics been worse?

Spanish Influenza is the worst pandemic in history Show more Show less

Following WWI, the Spanish flu killed millions across the world.
< (2 of 6) Next position >

Spanish Influenza killed completely healthy people

While previous influenza pandemics had mostly killed only the very old or very young, the Spanish flu affected even young, previously healthy people.
< (2 of 2) Next argument >

The Argument

While generally the flu and even pandemics more broadly affect mostly the very old and very young, Spanish flu killed people almost indiscriminately. A total of 50 million people died of Spanish flu, and about 500 million people were infected - a third of the world's population at the time.[1] It decreased average life expectancies by, on average, 12 years. However, what was unusual about these deaths was that many 20-40-year-olds were killed, while populations of elderly people were virtually unaffected.[2] This is extremely unusual for an influenza pandemic. It is theorised that this may be because elder people lived through the Russian flu pandemic at the end of the 19th century and were therefore immune.[3]

Counter arguments


[P1] Spanish influenza was unusual in that it was particularly fatal to younger people. [P2] This makes it a much scarier, and therefore much worse, pandemic.

Rejecting the premises




Not sure yet? Read more ↑


This page was last edited on Friday, 17 Apr 2020 at 11:16 UTC

Explore related arguments