According to the Sentencing Project, an estimated 6.1 million Americans have lost their voting rights because of felony disenfranchisement laws as of 2016. Lawmakers are divided about its implications: what constitutes human rights and what justifies taking them away, especially given a justice system that disproportionately imprisons minorities and the poor?
Felons should be allowed to vote once they have served their sentenceShow moreShow less
Once a sentence has been served, felons should not have to be continually punished. All of their rights should be reinstated.
America was founded on the ideal of 'no taxation without representation'. After completing their sentences, many felons go on to be gainfully employed and pay taxes to the government.
Since they are contributing to society, felons should be able to vote. It is unfair to make felons pay taxes to the government if they don't even have the ability to vote for their elected officials. They deserve to be represented by a government they help to fund.
While 'no taxation without representation' is a good idea, it does not work in practice. We do not offer everyone who pays taxes the right to vote - for instance, illegal immigrants, people under 18 - and equally, not everyone who votes pays taxes. Taxation is not the litmus test for the right to vote.
[P1] Felons who have served their sentence and go on to become employed contribute to society by paying taxes.
[P2] Because they pay taxes, they should be able to vote and be represented by their government.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P2] Paying taxes should not be used as the barometer for earning the right to vote.