argument top image

Should art and literature be moralizing? Show more Show less
Back to question

Yes, art and literature should be moralizing Show more Show less

Art and literature should be moralizing because they are powerful forms of creative expression that can bring about significant moral change in people. It also imparts moral teachings that are crucial to such forms of creative expression.
(1 of 2) Next position >

There is no such thing as amoral literature

The majority of novels contain some underlying philosophical, political, or social principles and it is impossible to create an amoral narrative.
(1 of 2) Next argument >

The Argument

Even if writers are not explicitly stating their political and moral beliefs in their novels, their principles nonetheless are evident in the novel’s themes and motifs, and the ways in which characters interact with each other. In novels, “ethics are measured and expressed in nonliteral units: the sorts of people to whom [the author] chooses to extend her theory of mind, the small details upon which her characters disagree, the extent to which they are willing to forsake integrity for social graces. [The author] does not inject her fiction with moral content, but moral content is there nonetheless.” Fictional tales in which good always triumphs over evil, or stories in which a protagonist achieves their long-desired goal, appeal to the “inherently moral nature of our consciousness.” It does not matter if literature is obligated to be ethical or not, because it’s impossible for a writer to create a narrative that is entirely amoral or a narrative that does not suggest that people should act a certain way.

Counter arguments

A novel can probe particular themes or philosophical questions without containing any overt ethical instructions or suggestions. Historically, literature took on the form of fables or parables, and in later years, Christians used writing and literature as a delivery mechanism for scriptural and religious messages. Today, the purpose of story-telling has evolved and stories no longer bear the responsibility of being our society's primary form of moral guidance, leaving authors free to broach other topics in their novels. Even though many readers might prefer a story with some sort of underlying moral, due to our inherent moral nature, literature is entirely subjective, so there could be just as many readers who would prefer to read a novel that could be viewed as frivilous or superficial, purely for the purposes of entertainment. A writer can craft an amoral character by focusing on particular themes "that offer comments or insights about the human experience. These are not lessons, so much as underlying meanings." A theme is the general, recurring idea or concept that runs throughout a work of literature, while the moral is the lesson that the author hopes readers learn once they finish the novel. Examples of a theme include the concept of death, or rebirth, or love, or friendship, and so on, while examples of morals would be "the grass is always greener on the other side," or "do not cheat," or "be generous." A book can easily go without an underlying moral as long as it probes a specific theme instead.

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

    Vote

    Not sure yet? Read more ↑

    Discuss

    This page was last edited on Wednesday, 26 Aug 2020 at 22:31 UTC

    Explore related arguments