argument top image

Is Moby-Dick worth reading?
Back to question

Moby-Dick is incredibly and often unnecessarily verbose and puzzling

The actual text of this novel is incredibly difficult to read, much less understand. In addition to this, the book is rather long and the topic often boring. Many readers don't care for such specific whaling knowledge nor have the patience to read through babbling and complicated passages on the subject.

The Argument

"Moby-Dick" is difficult for the average reader to read, much less understand. Sentences are long-winded and filled with bizarre and esoteric language. References range from the Bible to Cicero to Shakespeare and everything in between. It is no wonder that the main criticism of "Moby-Dick" is its unreadability. "Moby-Dick" is also a century and a half old. The novel and its language reflect that in almost every way with highfalutin prose and often ungraspable classical references. In addition to being just plain difficult to read, the novel tests the limits of people's patience in many ways. With a total of one hundred thirty-five chapters and over six hundred pages, there is no doubt that "Moby-Dick" is a lengthy book. Many of the chapters do not pertain to the plot in any discernible way; instead, many describe the whaling industry or various obscure facts about whales. These chapters slow down the plot so much that it turns the reader off and causes many to stop reading. With pompous prose and an unnecessarily slow story, many readers may find this novel uninteresting and esoteric. Such hurdles ultimately make reading "Moby-Dick" not worth the time.

Counter arguments

There is no doubt that this is a difficult book to read, but the incredibly long work is often thought to match/represent the arduous and onerous whaling voyage undertaken in the novel. The whaling chapters are not merely filler or encyclopedia material. Each of these chapters serves a specific purpose, whether it be providing context to whaling or using whaling as an elaborate conceit for metaphysical concepts.



Rejecting the premises


This page was last edited on Thursday, 27 Aug 2020 at 16:09 UTC

Explore related arguments