argument top image

Does the West still value human rights in light of its dismissal of Khashoggi's death? Show more Show less
Back to question

The West used to be the loudest voice advocating for human rights. But Western governments' evasive stances on the horrifying death of Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi government dissident, suggest this is no longer the case. In the light of huge economic links and political turbulence, are human rights still valued in western civilization?

Hard to say, because promoting human rights globally is complicated Show more Show less

There lies an array of predicaments.
< (3 of 5) Next position >

The West can't interfere in others' domestic affairs

There is the fine line between human rights cooperation and infringe on autonomy.
< (3 of 3) Next argument >

The Argument

In most cases, Non-western countries perceive international human rights treaties imposed by the West as cultural colonization and a stepping on their domestic affairs, repelled by such theory and practice of human rights exhibited as an act of superiority, which alike any other colonization the western countries undertook throughout the history. Non-western countries would strike back against the West based on the point that, the West itself is acquainted with social injustices, far from being in the state of human rights violations-free. For such reason, the West must act with cautions dealing with the boundary between promoting human rights internationally and intervene on internal political issues of others.

Counter arguments

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

    Vote

    Not sure yet? Read more ↑

    Discuss

    This page was last edited on Friday, 17 Apr 2020 at 09:58 UTC

    Explore related arguments