Traditionally, toymakers market their products to either girls or boys. The toy industry presents dolls and dresses as being girls’ toys, while cars and construction tools are for boys. In recent years, advocates have highlighted the presence of harmful gender stereotypes in such marketing tactics. Considering our society’s ongoing discussion of gender identity, should children’s toys continue to be gendered?
Yes, toys should be gendered
Girls and boys are different. By creating gender-specific toys, manufacturers simply cater to their differences.
The absence of gendered toys would threaten the toy industry
The production of gender-specific toys lends irreplaceable support to the economy.Explore
Gender-neutral toys would threaten traditional gender roles
If we stop producing gender-specific toys, children will not have toys that appeal to their differing societal roles.Explore
Gender-specific toys accurately cater to their demographic
Gender-specific toys are harmless because they appeal to natural differences between girls and boys.Explore
No, toys should not be gendered
Gendered toys reinforce stereotypes and harm childhood development.
Gender-specific toys harm childhood development
By prescribing certain toys to only one gender, we limit children's holistic development.Explore
Gender-specific toys are a relic of corporate greed
Toymakers created a lucrative industry by aggressively distinguishing between girls' and boys' toys.Explore
Gendered toys reinforce harmful stereotypes
Gender-specific toys encourage children to internalize harmful notions about gender identity.Explore
This page was last edited on Tuesday, 15 Sep 2020 at 07:22 UTC