convo top image

Is the theory of evolution by natural selection correct?

In the nineteenth century, Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace advanced a new theory to explain the origins of life on earth and the evolution of different lifeforms. They called it the theory of evolution by natural selection. Natural selection is the key mechanism by which all organisms have evolved. Today, many call the theory 'the theory of evolution' or 'Darwin's theory of evolution' (since Wallace is not as well-known).

Yes, the theory of evolution is correct

The theory is correct because it is supported by an abundance of historical and scientific data. It is also explanatorily successful and the bedrock of biology. In a nutshell, the theory says that all living organisms have emerged with variations from species that existed before them. This evolution happened through a phenomenon called natural selection. Natural selection can be described as "survival of the fittest" since the "fittest" organisms—the ones that are most cut out for their environment—are the ones that have the highest rate of reproduction and the greatest chance of passing on their best traits. A change in environment will spark a gradual change in those traits that help with survival.

Evidence of evolution from the fossil record


Evidence of evolution from comparative anatomy

Evidence of evolution from biogeography

Evidence of evolution from embryology

Evidence from modern biochemistry and molecular biology

Evidence of evolution from genetics

No, the theory of evolution is flawed on many levels

The theory is full of holes and up against serious challenges it cannot overcome. For many learned scientists and philosophers, it is defunct. Darwin's theory cannot account for human intelligence and speech. The human mind is far too complex and so is human speech. Blind, random, directionless processes—the phenomenon of natural selection—can never produce the mind, human speech, the cell, or DNA. The mathematical, philosophical, and scientific flaws in Darwin's theory have already been elucidated.

The fossil record is incomplete

If evolution happened through the gradual development and multiplication of slight variations, which is what evolutionists claim, then the fossil record should exhibit dead organisms closely constellated together with scarcely differentiated strata. But this is not the case. The record is filled with gaps.

Evolutionary thinking is flawed

Biologists are quick to fall into circular reasoning. To explain how an organism survived, they refer to its fitness, and to explain its fitness, they refer to how it survived. The explanations that evolutionary biologists provide create more questions and problems than answers.

The theory fails to exclude one contingency, thus it cannot be falsified

Evolutionary theory does not rule out a single possible case. We see different creatures behaving in different ways. When asked why this is so, or why it is the way it is, evolutionary biologists have nothing to say but "different organisms try different things." This is a very poor answer.

The theory is rooted in pure chance

Biological life is far too complex to have arisen from chance

The theory cannot account for the human mind or the phenomenon of language

The theory has serious mathematical problems

Explore this question in a whole new way.
This page was last edited on Monday, 4 Jan 2021 at 12:00 UTC