Mapping the world's opinions

convo top image

Is net neutrality good or bad?

Net neutrality is the idea that internet providers must not treat websites differently. All websites, irrespective of their content, equipment, or location must be treated with the same priority and speed. For net neutrality’s proponents, it is essential for preserving the internet’s commitment to information sharing and the establishment of a level playing field for all participants, but what are the pros and cons of net neutrality?

Net neutrality is good

Net neutrality prevents internet providers from becoming the gatekeepers of competition, information, and morality in the digital space.

Net neutrality promotes the exchange of information

The internet was originally built as an information exchange. Net neutrality promotes the exchange of information, thereby protecting the internet's core function. Explore

Net neutrality promotes competition

Net neutrality ensures a level playing field between companies operating online. Explore

Net neutrality protects service quality for lesser known sites

Without net neutrality, we would be forced to endure sub-par internet service quality when visiting certain sites. If only a few well-established domains load at faster speeds, then only content from those sites is readily available. This lowers the overall quality of information and resources available on the internet. Explore

Net neutrality helps the internet grow by being a launching pad for new web services

Net neutrality spurs innovation which helps the internet expand. If only a few established domains and services are favored by major internet providers, then it becomes very hard for emerging startups to become recognized and popular among the consumer base. Explore

Net neutrality is bad

Net neutrality regulation hinders innovation and development in our internet products, preventing the emergence of more effective practices and more practical business models.

Net neutrality raises the cost of internet for consumers

Net neutrality limits internet providers to a user-based revenue model. Explore

Net neutrality doesn’t allow for priority traffic

Not all internet processes have the same importance. Net neutrality cannot differentiate between processes of high and low importance. Explore

Net neutrality makes immoral content easily accessible

Net neutrality takes the job of blocking immoral and explicit content out of the hands of internet providers, thereby making it more accessible. Explore

Net Neutrality is expensive

Legislating and enforcing net neutrality laws is expensive. Explore

Net neutrality reduces investment in infrastructure

Without net neutrality, broadband providers would have an incentive to invest more heavily in their infrastructure. Explore

Net neutrality reduces the quality of service by allowing low-quality sites to succeed

Net neutrality results in a lower-quality service for all users. Some domains and web-services have earned a higher reputation because of the quality of content they provide. It is only fair to ensure that such websites are more readily available to consumers who prefer them. Explore
This page was last edited on Thursday, 12 Mar 2020 at 08:35 UTC