ClaraIM94

I agree with you, it’s also important to make a distinction between zoos and sanctuaries which allow visitors as they house and care for animals who aren’t able to live in the wild.

Regardless of whether I like or dislike Shakespeare’s work, his contribution to the English language and literary tradition is, I believe, not overrated.

Also, the fact that he, as a non-graduate, was able to make his mark on the world in a time when literature was largely dominated by the rich is a big thing. What I know of the 16th/17th centuries is far removed from Shakespeare, but his influence must have been to democratise this area of life, even just a little.

I think his contribution to the development of human culture cannot be underestimated.

While I agree with you, I would argue that being a mainstay of a curriculum doesn’t necessarily prove that he isn’t overrated. Curricula are designed and built to reflect what society thinks is important, not necessarily what is.