Opinion
Lab
Lab
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
Gender
AGREEDISAGREE
Male
Female
Non-binary
5 comments
For
AnnaHubbard5y ago
By banning these kinds of films or removing them from the public sphere, society remains uneducated on some of the issues that were culturally acceptable in the past, but are now acknowledged as intolerable. Removing these films alters cultural history as it denies that some opinions of the past did not exist. The controversial content within many of these films tends to consist of racist, sexist, and homophobic characters and comments which are now generally seen by modern audiences as unacceptable. If these films were not allowed to remain available to the public, people will forget that society has not always held the same values throughout time and the history of racism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of intolerance will be partially undermined. The controversial content should remain available to the public so people can educate themselves on some cultural history of the past, no matter how uncomfortable that history may be to confront.
Additionally, banning these films is a form of censorship and goes against democratic rights. Having organisations choose what films are acceptable for individuals to watch is immoral and oppressive. People should have the free will to choose whether they want to watch these films, rather than having institutions decide for everybody that certain films cannot been viewed by audiences. Many film companies have now introduced content warnings and prefaces to controversial classic ‘Old Hollywood’ films, including HBO Max’s new introduction to ‘Gone With the Wind’, which now includes two videos explaining the racism in the film and feature a disclaimer that states the film ‘denies the horrors of slavery’. [1] This information makes it apparent that the views in these movies have never been acceptable and do not represent the views of media companies today, ensuring that audiences understand the film’s cultural controversies whilst still allowing people to watch the film if they choose to do so. Preventing classic films with controversial content from remaining in the public sphere limits the historical understanding of the past, it is much better to keep these films available in order to acknowledge the past and to educate people on the history of different forms of oppression.
[1] Emma Kelly, ‘Metro’, 25th June 2020, (https://metro.co.uk/2020/06/25/gone-wind-returns-hbo-max-disclaimer-about-film-denying-horrors-slavery-12900820/)
··
Turi5y ago
Would love more info on the films that are banned and who is doing the banning! Where are we seeing it most?
··
AnnaHubbard5y ago
When discussing who is responsible for banning these films, it comes down to the film censorship departments and classification boards of individual countries. However, on a smaller scale, individual media companies and streaming sites also have the power to remove content and effectively ‘ban’ particular movies. Before HBO Max reintroduced ‘Wind in the Willows’ onto their streaming service they had completely removed it from their site and it was unable to be accessed by audiences who had the freedom to watch it previously. Much like this, Disney has been able to erase its ‘Song of the South’ film, which is famous for its racist depictions of black characters, out of existence. Although this erasure does not count as an official ban, because the film becomes inaccessible for everyone as the remaining copies exist in the “Disney vault”, the movie effectively is 'banned' from the public sphere.
Undoubtedly, countries which operate under strict systems of government or dictatorships are responsible for censoring larger numbers of films within their respective countries today. However, many democratic nations have removed a number of highly controversial films and outright banned many others. For example, over 1200 propaganda movies including the 1935 Nazi film ‘Triumph of the Will’ are still banned in Germany and remain prohibited in archives. These films could effectively be introduced to modern audiences again to illustrate how far Nazi propaganda had spread into media in the 1930s and to acknowledge and confront the ideas of the Nazi regime. Similarly, in America the original version of the 1915 movie ‘The Birth of a Nation’ remains banned in many states, as the film portrays the Klu Klux Klan in a positive light. Versions of the film have been heavily censored to avoid a complete ban. By removing this film from the public sphere America chooses to not teach people about racist attitudes within their country in the early 20th century. This film was even praised by the President at the time, Woodrow Wilson, and by banning the film the US refuses to acknowledge gruesome aspects of its past and educate society on it. By banning these films and refusing to accept the shame that these movies carry within society today, modern audiences receive less primary evidence of historical groups with shared opinions and the overall understanding of cultural history becomes undermined.
David Fear, Joshua Rothkopf and Keith Uhlich, ‘Time Out’, 5th August 2019, (https://www.timeout.com/newyork/film/the-50-most-controversial-movies-ever)
Michael Pullen, Paxton Rigby, Shane Walker, ‘The Censorship Files’, 15th November 2016, (https://thecensorshipfiles.wordpress.com/the-birth-of-a-nation/)
Matt Singer, ‘Screen Crush’, 4th March 2016, (https://screencrush.com/song-of-the-south-racism/#:~:text=After%20a%20return%20engagement%20in,on%20any%20home%20video%20format)
··
For
catrinw5y ago
I strongly agree with this opinion piece. I think that it is right for films with controversial topics to have a content warning at the beginning. However, to just ban the viewing of these films seems like we are trying to delete history which is a very dangerous territory. The whole point of learning from history for me is that as a society we can learn from it. By banning these films how would we ever be able to reflect on the past and appreciate how we have socially and culturally progressed?
··
Sign up or log in to post a comment.
Are we missing an argument?
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!