Opinion
Lab
Lab
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
Gender
AGREEDISAGREE
Male
Female
Non-binary
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
4 comments
Peter Turchin's theory of Elite Overproduction describes a society which produces too many potential elite-members (based on education) to readily absorb them into the structure of power. When this happens, revolution ensues.
Turchin predicted the rise of populism in the US and Europe in 2010, and is predicting the next decade will be the 'Turbulent Twenties'
Whilst I agree that elite overproduction may occur, I don't believe it is the 'real driver' of social unrest in the west.
There is no one driver of social unrest, however in the instances referred to by Turchin I argue that the cause would not be elite overproduction itself causing social unrest but the myth of meritocracy.
It is more likely fueled by the disappointment and later, anger, which ensued at the realisation that the promise that a university degree costing tens of thousands of dollars and a good hard working ethic is all you need to succeed was a lie, rather than being fuelled by simply feeling left out and aggrieved that they are not a part of the elite.
Not everyone who get an education do so with the aim of becoming a part of the elite ruling class, but simply want to earn a decent living in an industry that they enjoy, or want to gain more knowledge and experience in a particular sector. Hence they would not be aggrieved by not becoming part of the elite, but may be by not being able to find work in their field after graduating.
The amount of elites ignoring and perpetuating the world's problems can be seen as a cause of social unrest all around the world.
I'm not sure this is the argument of Elite Overproduction. See the Commentary at the top!
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!