TL;DR: Feminist theologians reinterpret religion from a feminist perspective

Feminism is not incompatible with religion. Many feminists are religious and there are feminists of every faith. Feminist theology is a movement and theoretical practice that applies feminist theory to religious study and interpretation. It is not restrained to one religion but is intersectional, as feminist theologians of all ethnicities, nationalities, and faiths attempt to reinterpret and reclaim different religions from a feminist perspective.

Feminist theologians attest that oppressive patriarchal systems have formed and instructed religious institutions and their teachings, through interpreting religious texts in a way that justifies the oppression of women. Through critically reading and re-translating the language of religious texts, feminist theologians emphasise the overarching messages of equality, justice, and freedom that exist in almost every religion.

For example, Hindu feminist theology centres the importance of Shakti the Mother Goddess; Christian feminist theology emphasises the portrayal of women as leaders, theologians, and intellectuals in John’s Gospel; Muslim feminist theology emphasises the Prophet Muhammad’s call for women’s rights; and Jewish feminist theology builds upon the many religious and political roles of women found in the Torah. By re-reading and reinterpreting religious texts critically, many feminist theologians find feminism to be compatible with religion, and are working to create religious institutions that reflect this.

Feminism may be incompatible with certain interpretations or particular elements in specific religions, but is not incompatible with religion itself.

Religion is a set of beliefs, a faith in all-powerful, omnipotent figures (usually gods and goddesses) involving forms of worship and other practices. Feminism is a social movement that calls for the equality of the sexes in all facets of the human condition - political, economical, social, and personal.

While this claim might be sub-textually referring to specific religions and their incompatibility, the statement seems to literally imply a fundamental disagreement - that feminism is incompatible with religion, instead of merely the existing religions.

This is untrue; religion as a framework itself does not require gender inequity. Rather, it is an unfortunate result of the long-standing divide between male and female privileges and places within society that religious rhetoric has favoured men. As a product of human thought, religion naturally reflects the ideas of the society that birthed it. In short, a religion created today can easily be wholly compatible with the feminism that pervades in our current social atmosphere.

Some might still argue, however, that religions will continue to preserve ideals from a society that is incompatible with feminism - recognising that religions are often based on older texts and traditions that have persisted through conservative practice. In this case, we must decide whether religion is inherently rigid, or if it is/can be fluid with the evolving society. Feminist theology, as freyaehope outlines in detail, is evidence to the latter. While tradition and past principles play defining roles in religion, these myths, metaphors, and phenomena can be reinterpreted, and the continuing presence of religious authorities makes this possible - pundits, pastors, and monks born to contemporary societal epochs are likely to emulate more modern ideas in their practice, and ensure that religion is not contingent solely on interpretation by past authorities.

• The reverend at my nearby Episcopal Church, which I visited out of interest in the Sunday sermon, explained the perpetual reinterpretation and varied contextualisation of The Bible as artefacts of the human inability to be the most precise conduits of God's ideas. In her sermon, she used The Bible to give credence to Critical Race Theory while, in the past, The Bible has also been used to give credence to Slavery. In her words, _the Word of God remains just but, we, as flawed beings, can often make flawed interpretations of God's message.

In this particular light, for all we are capable of fathoming, even existing religions may be more feminist than we believe, and we are merely operating on time-honoured but outdated ideas.

Some opinions within feminism and religion won't be tolerated by either side, making compatibility tricky to navigate

• Most religions have strong ideas about fighting against oppression, which is what feminism seeks to do in trying to create equal rights for men and women. Take this list of bible verses which discuss freedom from oppression. . Here, I think religion and feminism are completely compatible.

• I think it is more significant though to read 'incompatible' in a different way, which is less about theory and definition and more about whether religious people have space to exist within feminism and whether feminists have space to exist within religion.

• Feminism accommodates religion well in that it emphasises freedom of choice, which is especially significant when it comes to clothing choice. Freedom to cover as well as reveal your body is championed by many feminists, which is of great significance to Muslim women particularly.

• However, the main contentious point which makes secular and certain non-religious people clash is the pro-life/pro-choice debate. Both sides believe that their stance is the most fundamentally feminist one. As this is a disagreement over what constitutes 'freedom' or a human right, which both sides champion, there is little room to find common ground.

• Feminism is sometimes not welcomed in religious spaces. Calls to radically change patriarchal structures within religious institutions have been met with a lack of engagement from people with power. Take the Vatican's 'voices of faith' conference, where proposals for a meeting to discuss gender inequality were refused.

Personally, I think feminism and my personal faith exist in complete harmony, however both feminism and religion include a variety of people that will clash ideologically.