Opinion
Lab
Lab
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
Gender
AGREEDISAGREE
Male
Female
Non-binary
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
5 comments
TL;DR - Healthcare should be readily available to all, but nothing is totally free
Healthcare is vital. It is one of the most important things we need and it should be available to all. Throughout all of our lives, healthcare plays a part, whether it be tests, vaccines, treatment or mental health services, healthcare is essential. So with this, I argue that for all intense and purposes it should be “free”.
However I take issue with the term free. Healthcare, at least where I grew up in the U.K is considered ‘free’. One never has to worry about the costs of getting ill or attaining an injury. YET, the NHS or global/international equivalent still needs funding. It is not totally free, we pay higher tax to cover costs. When politicians for example want more and more to be ‘free’ it just means it has to be paid for as a collective rather than by the individual.
My point being, yes healthcare should be available and free to use, but it cannot just be free, things have to be paid for somehow.
The right to life is a fundamental human right thus Healthcare should always be free
So should the doctors work for free? And should the pharmaceutical companies give out drugs for free? Should the nurses not get paid either? I don't see how your idea would be possible?
Is health a human right?
• Some people believe that health care is a human right and therefore everyone should be able to access health care, regardless of their income. They argue that private health services (where patients must pay out of pocket) discriminate against those in poverty as they are often unable to pay medical fees and end up unable to access health care.
• Others disagree as they believe that every individual has a responsibility to look after their own health. They argue that free health care removes an incentive for living healthily.
Others argue that free healthcare is of a lower quality than personally funded health care.
• Some argue that health care can never be free – people in medical professions must earn a salary, medical supplies must be paid for, and hospitals must be maintained, among many other costs. ‘Free health care’ is generally used to refer to public health services, such as the NHS in the United Kingdom. These health services are not free, but funded by the money from taxpayers rather than from patients directly.
Free healthcare ensures that everyone, regardless of income, can access necessary medical services, which promotes overall public health and reduces preventable diseases. It removes financial barriers that discourage people from seeking care until conditions worsen. While funding free healthcare requires taxes or redistribution, the social benefits—like healthier populations and reduced emergency costs—often outweigh these concerns. Free healthcare reflects a commitment to equity and human dignity.
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!