Opinion
Lab
Lab
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
Gender
AGREEDISAGREE
Male
Female
Non-binary
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
2 comments
Commentary
What is a 'Nation-State'?
According to Oxford Languages, the definitions of 'nation' and 'state' are as follows:
'Nation' - A large group of people with shared factors such as a common ethnicity, culture, history and language, often inhabiting a particular territory.
'State' - A territory considered as an organized political community under one government.
A 'nation-state' is a political unit where the state and nation are congruent.
Modern nation-states: "Legitimate states that govern effectively and dynamic industrial economies are widely regarded today as the defining characteristics of a modern nation-state."
Their attitudes differ compared to non-nation-states in that they tend to be more patriotic, territorial, and oppose immigration policies.
Why was it originally considered fit for purpose?
Why is it being considered increasingly irrelevant/no longer fit for purpose?
Why could it still be considered fit for purpose?
Before the nation-state
Commentators have suggested that globalisation is the main reason for the apparent demise of the nation state.
A nation state is an entity that has a defined territory, a single government that rules over a population and the recognition of the global community. Over the past few decades, there have been suggestions that the nation state is no longer fit for purpose for the following reasons:
• Controlling capital: Global capitalism has led to the growth of multinational corporations which operate on a transnational scale. They are unrestricted by borders and so international regulators such as the World Bank and the WTO have a role to play in this. States have found difficulties in taxing the profits of these companies, especially tech firms such as Google and Amazon, and thus struggle to deal with the planetary wealth inequalities that arise from this.
• Global problems: Nowadays, problems rarely occur on a national scale. With threats such as pandemics, terrorism and climate change, states have consistently demonstrated that individual action is not enough to tackle these issues.
• Migration: According to UN research, the global population of migrants has increased from 2.8% in 2000 to 3.5% in 2019. In light of this, it has been suggested that the nation state, which emphasises the importance of a shared cultural identity, may be unequipped for the upward trend in migration in the next decade.
In my opinion, I believe that the concept of a nation state is not entirely obsolete as it is still able to provide its citizens with some sense of security and identity. Regardless, the points mentioned above provide strong evidence that the nation state is not as strong an actor in international affairs as it once was.
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!