Opinion
Lab
Lab
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
Gender
AGREEDISAGREE
Male
Female
Non-binary
3 comments
For
Brandoflores5y ago
**TL;DR- In more recent times, subcultures are being commodified at a faster rate making them more accessible to the general public and intergraded into the mainstream.**
Subcultures (or communities) are basically everywhere nowadays; whether you are a gamer, sports fan, skater, or vegan, everyone has a subculture nowadays, or at least at one point identified with one back in their youth. But many of these subcultures are going through a process of commodification, or the transformation of goods, services, ideas, nature, personal information, or people into commodities or objects of trade [1].
Many subcultures understandably rely on a level of financial investments like cosplaying, which is understandable, but I'm not talking about those types of commodities. I am referring to the transformation of a subculture into a product you can buy or profit from in a way that was not intended. The most notable example of this is the commodification of the hipster/indie style and their preferences and symbols. A decade ago, being hipster/indie meant rejecting the mainstream and living a more ironic lifestyle, but it really didn't take long before they were swallowed by the mainstream media and turned into some joke, and remnants left of their fashion have become Walmart-level of mainstream.
The process of commodification is not only ending trends more quickly by making them more mainstream, but it's also making them accessible to the point of meaninglessness. For example, purchasing the expensive goth attires without being goth is a trend of its own; looking like a goth/emo no longer means you listen to heavy music or are part of any other things associated with the subculture. If you have the money to afford to look like a goth, you can be goth [2].
This may seem harmless, but some subcultures do have important origins and rituals. Tattoos, piercings, and other types of body modification used to be a subculture of their own in the 1950s. Only poor males living in impoverished socio-economic conditions had tattoos and were part of that subculture. Over the years, body modifications became associated with the rejection of modernity and the counterculture movements of the 1960s-1970s as a symbol of resistance. As these rebellious trends from the subculture become popular to the general public, mainstream culture reclaims the trend and uses it to generate further demand for the culture and consumer industries [3].
The mainstream culture does not interest in the origins of expression behind these tattoos; they're just taken as a style that could be generalized, torn from its precise contextual meaning. This integration and commodification of body modification erased their origins by reorganizing workshop practices, markets, regulating technology, and formalizing occupational career permits and processes [3].
Subcultures becoming mainstream is not a new concept, but the accessibility of the internet and mass social media interconnectivity makes this happen much quicker. Again I don't think this is good or bad—this is just a general comment.
[1] Commodification
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodification
[2] Reddit: Controversial question! Do you believe that someone can be goth (fashion, interest, aesthetic wise) and not enjoy goth music?
https://www.reddit.com/r/goth/comments/ahy1yz/controversial_question_do_you_believe_that/
[3] Modified People: Indicators of a Body Modification Subculture in a Post-Subculture World
https://www-jstor-org.uidaho.idm.oclc.org/stable/pdf/44016774.pdf?ab_segments=0%252Fbasic_search_gsv2%252Ftest&refreqid=excelsior%3A747c18dfe58bea780d3b85ae74081021
··
Turi5y ago
Does everything go faster with the internet? Have trends accelerated their turn-over? I mean, we now have meme dictionaries to keep up...
··
Brandoflores5y ago
Yes, Its the efficiency of e-commerce, the increasing interconnectivity of social media, and the quick access to all information that make trends, subcultures, and novelties die quickly. The out-group and in-group boundaries are so blurred its more difficult to identify subculture membership.
I could buy punk clothes, read a Wikipedia article on punk history, and listen to all relevant albums in less than a week and then call myself a punk.
If I was a bit more wealthy I could start a rapping career through Instagram just by hiring someone to produce a trap beat, investing on video production, and paying for ads targeted at the suburban youth. (yes this is actually a thing)
The commodification process perhaps makes subcultures and trends more democratic and available, but its torn from its original context.
But I don't know about memes. I noticed that's the one concept that is difficult to commodify. The concept of 'memes' is just too abstract and versatile, and they tend to mutate into different forms within days. Meme dictionaries can help us understand trends but its difficult to use memes like a tattoo or an outfit, or a community because memes are on a state of continuous multiplicity.
For example, the Karen meme his different origins, some say it comes from the haircut, other say it comes from entitled suburban middle age women, and now it could just be any white woman with racist tendencies. You can't commodify a Karen into a product like the 'stonks' memes or cat memes because it has mixed messages, its a critique on entitlement and also comments sexist towards middle age women.
··
Sign up or log in to post a comment.
Are we missing an argument?
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!