Opinion
Lab
Lab
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
Gender
AGREEDISAGREE
Male
Female
Non-binary
5 comments
Mixed
meglev245y ago
**TL;DR - We have all heard the phrase “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”. It may be a cliché but it rings true**
I think most people can understand why the subject of terrorism is a very subjective matter. This does not mean that acts of terror are justified however, just from different, often extreme perspectives, some may view terror as a necessity for change.
There are many international and domestic laws on terrorism and “where the line is drawn” however these laws are often bent to adjust to different circumstances. An example would be the guerrilla warfare in Vietnam during the 1960s. Some argue that U.S. involvement was terrorism as it was not only not necessary, but a deliberate attack on civilians. The use of napalm and other search and destroy tactics were used on civilians! This is where for me terrorism is not justified. There are many extreme groups who argue that some acts of terror are necessary to change society however, it often unifies the country attacked and solidifies values rather than having the opposite effect. There is no way the amount of civilian destruction as a result of terrorism can be justified.
Another quite frustrating thing about the subjectivity of this is that some use the term terrorist trivially or as a term for protesters or rioters. If protestors are referred to as terrorists or participating in terrorism then in this case they could be justified! Making a statement though a protest or riot that promotes change is, of course, justified. This only creates more problems in how the subject is too subjective for objective statements (like it is sometimes justified) to be made about it!
··
Turi5y ago
Terrorism is the killing of civilians for political gain. It's also one of the very few truly devastating weapons of the weak against the strong. Which makes it, in a sense, an understandable tactic in asymmetric warfare.
Understandable, heart-breakingly so in some instances, but *still* unethical.
··
rabidfox4y ago
I disagree there is a dictionary definition and a legal one the legal definition comes from Terrorism Act 2000(in the uk) which defines terrorism, both in and outside of the UK, as the use or threat of one or more of the actions listed below, and where they are designed to influence the government, or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public. The use or threat must also be for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.
The specific actions included are:
*serious violence against a person;
*serious damage to property;
*endangering a person's life (other than that of the person committing the action);
*creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public; and
*action designed to seriously interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.
So i freedom fighter that is trying to defeat a totalitarian, fascist police state is covered by this. Also eco-fascists and anarchists if they put belief into practice
··
Mixed
Vickigas5y ago
Terrorism is never justified. So many people that are innocent are killed and misplaced. Of course we need to fight and defend the rights of ordinary people. But blatant terrorism is not acceptable.
··
Against
stealthbeast5y ago
The word "terrorism" itself has purely negative connotation.
That being said, sometimes we misapply the word "terrorism". And the word is often used to be dismissive of a "terrorist". Sometimes, people organize and rebel, and sometimes that involves guerrilla warfare, which is already kind of... "terroristy" looking.... (wtf? Yeah that's a word now. deal wit it)
As an American (or really, as a person), I don't want to oversimplify even our enemy's position. ISIS had a point in that America is often poisonous to this planet. Unfortunately, ISIS's methods mean they need to be eradicated with extreme prejudice. But we should at least try to UNDERSTAND the position of the people who hate us. Think about where they were raised. Who was around them. The options they had. You think you would fare differently if born into their situation? I mean... I guess I'd like to THINK so... but that's easy for me to say while sitting in this air conditioned room in this Barbie world we call America.
··
Sign up or log in to post a comment.
Are we missing an argument?
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!