Opinion
Lab
Lab
See how this opinion breaks down by gender, political spectrum and generation — and who shares your view.
Gender
AGREEDISAGREE
Male
Female
Non-binary
3 comments
Against
freyaehope5y ago
**TL;DR: Everyone loves Shakespeare, and Shakespeare loved a poo joke**
- Toilet humour is _unifying_. Grounded in human bodily functions, every human has experienced going to the toilet, and therefore every human can find toilet humour relatable. Fart jokes transcend cultural or linguistic differences – they don’t need translating.
- Scatological humour has been well-used as a literary device by many celebrated writers and artists. [Shakespeare’s plays](https://www.barnesandnoble.com/blog/shakespeares-filthiest-puns-are-being-lost-in-translation/) are littered with dirty jokes; Titian’s painting of [Bacchus and Ariadne](https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200813-the-secret-toilet-humour-in-a-titian-masterpiece) hides multiple visual innuendoes; James Joyce’s works are filled with flatulent onomatopoeia. These works are considered ‘high art’ and have received continual popularity despite of, or perhaps owing to, their prominence of poo jokes.
··
Turi5y ago
The counter would be that Martin Luther, one of the least funny people in the history of unfunny people, also had a [spectacularly potty mouth](https://www.wilsonquarterly.com/quarterly/summer-2012-american-vistas/the-scatological-luther/).
··
Sign up or log in to post a comment.
Are we missing an argument?
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!
Make the case or invite a friend to comment!