DarkJak

Harsher, no. More effective, yes.

Sentencing time based off severity of crime determined by judge is an archaic model when we have plenty of slave drivers that would love additional hands to focus their energy on more productive labors of society. Over-punishing in my experience has led me to retaliate against my handlers more than repent which we are more likely to do when displaced to a more concise, orderly, and constructive environment.

TL:DNR Trump is "the worst" because of a framing by media companies that were bought and surrogated by int'l conglomerates that got rich by lobbying politicians to secure longevity of their profitable exploitation of resources.

As for myself, NEVER do I hear him compare NOR contrasted to any presidents besides Obama. Obama being a president whose presidency came down to extending war crimes against Middle Eastern nations whose resources created American dependency on fossil fuels. AND, a presidency that came out SWINGING for the bail out of financial institutions that contribute nothing concrete to American exports, but to limit consumer spending especially ownership. Not to mention, a transfer of online platforms from advertising free-for-alls to data-selling strongholds.

It boils down to, is it better to have lived and died than to have never lived at all. Is it ethical to deny that as one individual who first decided to bear it?

TL;DNR Lying has evolved as a tool of higher intelligence to manipulate the uninformed into making effective decisions they might not otherwise choose.
-Lying can be wrong when used to manipulate a weaker mind into exploitation
-Lying can be good when a desired motivation aspires from the listener
-It all depends on how effective the rhetoric is at improving the audience
-We use lies even on children when the complex answer won't drive them
-Steve Jobs knew the benefits of lying even if he had to fall on his sword
-In conclusion, there are right/wrong answers, but a lie has higher intention