Oli004800

I'd consider this more of genetic variation within the sex rather than a separate sex itself. There are only two types of sex chromosomes: X and Y. They are almost always correctly matched together (XX or XY) but there are cases of a genetic mishap and an XXY, XYY, XXX, or something else.

My general thought is:
Presence of one or more Y chromosomes = male
No presence of X chromosomes = female

I don't think there are more than two sexes. People with one of these combinations (not XX or XY) may have atypical physical, hormonal, and mental features and be at higher risk for some types of diseases but this shouldn't be grounds for discrimination.

Edit: for/against indicator (against = against banning it in schools).
There is widespread misunderstanding of Critical Race Theory. The common misconception is that "white people are the sole cause of racism" and "all white people oppress all black people." First, I will attempt to clear up confusion.

The most significant points of it are:
-systemic racism has heavily impacted American history and politics and thus the experiences of black/other non-white families
-systemic racism exists in American governmental institutions through laws and policies
-a shift in public policy is needed to rectify longstanding systemic racism

Longstanding systemic racism means:
Laws that have been intentionally and unintentionally geared towards disadvantaging black families and individuals have existed since the beginning of the settling of the New World (American continents). Since the times of slavery, black families have always been poorer. Poor people/families will always have a disadvantage and the chance of getting rich is very small; otherwise, many more people would be richer.
Disadvantages such as:
-Less/worse education, especially after high school, coupled with higher rates of dropout among black children/teens because they have to work to make ends meet for their families
-Worse housing situation, because black families have less money and are often forced to live in the "worse parts of town" or "ghettos" by exclusionary zoning laws aimed at preventing black families from being able to afford nicer homes that white families are more able to afford. These families will be exposed to more crime that is not necessarily their fault, and police will also patrol these neighborhoods more due to the increased crime rates.

Now, for the opinion part:
I don't think teaching these concepts, collectively known as Critical Race Theory should be banned. A big part of it is historical analysis. Slavery and Jim Crow laws are often taught in schools, but classes should also teach about other discriminatory laws that are simply a fact of history. Additionally, analysis of the current government will reveal laws that victimize poor families in general, as well as black families; sometimes separately, sometimes simultaneously.

I don't think history and politics should be banned, I don't think teaching the slave trade, the Civil War, the Jim Crow era, or the functioning of the modern American government should be banned. By teaching these historical events, it could be naturally concluded, even without the direct teaching of Critical Race Theory, that its central tenets are true.

With emphasis on availability, yes, absolutely. Is abortion advisable and the first option? No. Education and prevention of pregnancy must come first. Abortion should be a last resort. Education hurts no one. There are people who make mistakes, and even though there is a chance they will not learn from the mistakes, they should still get a chance. Another very important point is that in some cases, a pregnancy could result in serious health consequences for the mother, sometimes as serious as death. Would it be moral to allow the mother to die or experience permanent illness or injury?

Education will prevent abortion; people (men and women) must be taught to be responsible and while abstinence only is the best way, it's simply impossible to force everyone to adhere to these standards. The next step is birth control (pills, sterilization, condoms, etc.).

On the morality side, it can be argued that ending the life of a separate organism (any time after conception) is wrong, but it also must be considered that once the baby is born, it might be born in a toxic environment in which the parent(s) is/are unable or unwilling to care for the child. The child will suffer more and so will the parents. If abortion is wrong, steps should be taken to ensure that the child grows up in a safe environment, which is often not the case.

It can further be argued that women who typically need abortions are prone to a risky lifestyle and are therefore, on average, less fit to be parents. What should the solution to this be? A risky lifestyle is often correlated with lower education, so it would make sense that education can prevent both the risky lifestyle and the problems that come from it (unwanted pregnancy).

And finally, abortion, if outlawed, will still occur, only illegally and unsafely, or a mother will travel to another state where it is legal.