Jezzaftw

Real overstrech for cultural appropriation.

Nobody wants to play a game where we divide ourselves more by saying what people can wear and what they cant wear because of their skin colour.

For example if I said people who arent white shouldnt be allowed to wear suits because those were invented by a british gentlemen everyone would scream racism, this opinion is just a double standard imo.

People who are a net negative to humanity's progress shouldnt exist and all possible actions must be taken to prevent their existence should be taken, while banning someone from reproducing is overly controlling funding their existance through welfare programs on the condition they dont reproduce is, should they reproduce they receive no money from state welfare and are forced to fund themselves or die trying.

Because its not my fault or problem if nature has decided someone doesnt make the cut. There will reach a point where the effects of those who are a net negative will outweigh those of the net positive and then.

Progression then slows as we struggle to feed and provide for hundreds of millions maybe even billions of people. Among them many will turn violent since humans are all completel narcissists , thh i cant blame them for not wanting to be told your not important enough to live. Its really just a question of when if things continue at this pace.

I for one want those who are most likely to be productive and have productive children to exist in the future. Its really not a argument intended to be personally offensive, its just a human wanting his species to be as successful as possible.

Not only that but its expensive paying for the upkeep and maintenance of millions of people, those funds could also be left untaxed and used for the enjoyment of those who actually earned that money, rather than funding what is likely a painful existence.

Jews have been used as scapegoats for centuries. A less known example is the 2nd crusades were funded by edward the hamme of the scots. He funded them by expelling taxing and robbing jews for decades and started a 300 year long period of anti-Semitism in england

Kk so to make my point i will use an example. (No offence to any racial or religious groups intended)

Pretend i own a small clothes store, one day a devoute muslim walks in and informs me that my store is haram (violates his religious laws) due to the insturmental music playing in the background and that i must stop playing instrumental music in my store or that i am islamophobic.

The above scenario helps illustrate my point, ones personal choices cannot have implications on society. I think if someone wants to be called "xi" or something its resonable for them to exoeft their friends to respect that and refer to them as that, however they begin to impose on people the moment they expect people with a more formal or professional relationship to do so too. Wether it be their professor, the bagger at the local tesco or a random person passing in the street.

Note i do think this person should be protected against harrasment where in someone deliberately tries to communicate with them in order to ignore and Mock thier personal choice

So many people saying human life is worth more than food and people should be entitled to food.

Issue isnt the 1 act, if only the people starving stole just enough food to survive everything would be fine. But anarchy starts when people steal food regardless of if they cant afford to pay for it and/or take more than they need.

The concept of a transaction is worth a lot more than a single human life

I went to a public school and lemme tell you it is awful. As a student who enjoyed science and engineering i always found myself in a position where the uneducated hooligans had vandalised all the equipment. I believe private schools are fair for this reason, people pay a lot of money for good equipment for learning and will be charged for damages made by their children.

A public school where children only attend due to obligation with parents who are indifferent to their behavior is always going to have worst equipment and funding due to the overwhelming amount of effort that must go into discipline and time wasted by people disrupting and most significantly vandalism.

The existance of private schools isnt the problem, the negligence of parents is, i think parents should be fined for their children interupting lessons. Maybe then their children will start behaving.