Home Categories About
argument top image
Is herd immunity the best way to beat coronavirus? Is herd immunity the best way to beat coronavirus?
Herd immunity is our best defence against the spread of coronavirus Herd immunity is our best defence against the spread of coronavirus
Herd immunity will not work Herd immunity will not work
Herd immunity is a risky bet Herd immunity is a risky bet
Herd immunity is irrelevant Herd immunity is irrelevant
Herd immunity has worked to stop viruses before Herd immunity has worked to stop viruses before
Herd immunity will not work because you can get coronavirus twice Herd immunity will not work because you can get coronavirus twice
The effects of covid are likely to be worse second time around The effects of covid are likely to be worse second time around
To achieve this would cause an impermissible death rate To achieve this would cause an impermissible death rate
Herd immunity is risky because some people will die of coronavirus Herd immunity is risky because some people will die of coronavirus
Herd immunity is risky because the virus could mutate Herd immunity is risky because the virus could mutate
Herd immunity should not be a strategy when there is no vaccine Herd immunity should not be a strategy when there is no vaccine
Questioning the merits of herd immunity is, in itself, a misnomer Questioning the merits of herd immunity is, in itself, a misnomer
Debate Mini Map

Is herd immunity the best way to beat coronavirus?
Back to question

Herd immunity will not work

< (2 of 4) Next position >

To achieve this would cause an impermissible death rate

< (3 of 3) Next argument >

The Argument

Counter arguments

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

This page was last edited on Friday, 30 Oct 2020 at 18:21 UTC

Explore related arguments