argument top image

Is herd immunity the best way to beat coronavirus? Show more Show less
Back to question

Herd immunity strategy has come under scrutiny. Herd immunity assumes a large section of the population will be infected. Rather than enforce lockdown measures, herd immunity encourages social distancing in public places. The aim is to have as many low-risk people infected as possible. Immune people cannot infect others. Therefore, the more there are, the faster we kill its exponential growth, and the easier it will be to treat the vulnerable. The WHO has criticised the approach, as have many others. Is the Swedish government correct?

Herd immunity will not work Show more Show less

This approach to the coronavirus pandemic is counterproductive, foolhardy and dangerous.
< (2 of 4) Next position >

To achieve this would cause an impermissible death rate

< (3 of 3) Next argument >

The Argument

Counter arguments

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

This page was last edited on Friday, 30 Oct 2020 at 18:21 UTC

Explore related arguments