argument top image

< Back to question Should the movie industry focus less on remakes and sequels? Show more Show less

Currently, many of the movies produced in the film industry are remakes, reboots or sequels. At times, these franchise films seem to outnumber films at the cinema with new, standalone plots. While remakes and sequels are often more certain bets for the producers, does this trend negatively impact the film world?

No, the balance between franchise films and original films is good. Show more Show less

People want to see more of the characters that they know and love.
< (2 of 2)

Franchises keep the industry profitable

As sequels and remakes often have built-in audiences, they are safer and often return more profits. This keeps the film industry alive.
< (1 of 2) Next argument >


Not sure yet? Read more before voting ↓


The Argument

Production of remakes, reboots and sequels helps the film industry return profits. This argument assumes that remakes, reboots and sequels come with built-in fans of the prior work which are interested in the new works in the franchises. They will more reliably turn out to see the new films in this franchise than a general audience will to see original films. We see this with films such as Avengers: Endgame, which broke the world box office record as part of a muti-dozen film series. The film industry is a risky business running on slim margins, so safe bets are necessary for a studio to survive. Safe bets such as franchise films can be used to both keep the studio running and fund more original, smaller films, so the distinction between franchise films and original films is not absolute.

Counter arguments

Fan turnout for franchise films is far from guaranteed. Movies like Ghostbusters (2016) and Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker have recently returned more disappointing box office numbers than the company anticipated.


Rejecting the premises


    This page was last edited on Thursday, 23 Jul 2020 at 19:53 UTC

    Explore related arguments