argument top image

What happened at Chernobyl? Show more Show less
Back to question

On April 26, 1986, one of the most devastating nuclear disasters in history occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant near Pripyat, Ukraine. An explosion at Chernobyl's reactor number 4 destroyed the facility's protections against nuclear radiation and sent massive quantities of radioactive fallout into the atmosphere. Was the catastrophe simply a tragic failure of nuclear safety systems? Or did something more than a mere accident happen at Chernobyl?

A nuclear accident happened at Chernobyl Show more Show less

A combination of technical problems and inadequate safety measures led to a catastrophic explosion.
(1 of 2) Next position >

The Chernobyl's reactor's design was flawed

Chernobyl's reactors were built on the Soviet RBMK design, which had dangerous deficiencies.
(1 of 3) Next argument >

The Argument

Chernobyl's reactor number four was an RBMK reactor, an unusual Soviet design with serious flaws that allowed the catastrophic failure to occur. Specifically, RBMK reactors had problems with their void coefficients and control rod design. Nuclear reactors are powered by nuclear chain reactions that generate heat through the process of fission. Critical components of nuclear reactors include the coolant, which cools the reactor core and transfers heat to electrical generators, and the control rods, which allow operators to control the rate of fission in the reactor in order to keep power levels within normal operating parameters. The RBMK design used for Chernobyl's reactors used water as a coolant and had a positive void coefficient. The void coefficient refers to the proportion of steam bubbles in the reactor's coolant, and a positive void coefficient means that an increase in steam leads to an increase in reactivity. Reactors with positive void coefficients are highly unstable when operating at low power levels. This is what happened at Chernobyl: reactor number four became unstable when it was operated under very low power. The problem was exacerbated by an inadequate number of control rods, and by the fact that the lengths of the control rods did not match their required specifications.

Counter arguments

Premises

Rejecting the premises

References

This page was last edited on Tuesday, 10 Nov 2020 at 17:24 UTC

Explore related arguments