argument top image

Are economic sanctions effective? Show more Show less
Back to question

Economic sanctions are trade restrictions imposed on a country or group in an attempt to create economic pressure. This pressure may or may not incite behavioral change, typically political or economic in nature. Economic sanctions have long been used as a political tool between nations, but should they be used this way?

Yes, economic sanctions are effective Show more Show less

Hurting another country's economy is an effective and non-violent way to get them to re-evaluate their actions
(1 of 2) Next position >

Economic sanctions are effective when there is strength in numbers

Economic sanctions that are enforced by a diverse group of countries are successful and effective.
< (2 of 2) Next argument >

The Argument

Economic sanctions are useful in sending a message to a country, especially when that message is spoken by a collection of countries. During apartheid in South Africa, sanctions were enforced by the United Nations starting as early as 1962.[1] In 1985, Britain enforced sanctions on South Africa, and a year later the U.S. passed the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act. This act enforced sanctions on South Africa in an effort to move the country out of apartheid. These countries stopped purchasing uranium and other products from South Africa, and the collective decision to do so devastated the South African economy. In addition to their effect on the economy, the sanctions helped to end apartheid.[2] Sanctions, when enforced by a collection of diverse countries, are highly effective.

Counter arguments

Some economic sanctions simply are too political to be effective, even when enforced by a collection of countries. For example, during the Cold War, sanctions were mostly ineffective. This is because if the U.S. and anti-Communist countries refused to trade with a given country the USSR would take their place, and vice versa. When there are multiple "superpower" countries with different ideologies, sanctions become significantly less effective.

Premises

[P1] Countries who impose economic sanctions have an economic relationship with the target country that would be negatively impacted by limiting or ceasing trade. [P2] Therefore, economic sanctions are an effective non-violent penalty to a given country.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P1] Not all countries are dependent on each other and/or economically intertwined.

References

  1. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-1-4039-1591-7%2F1.pdf
  2. https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/11/19/sanctions-successes-and-failures/sanctions-were-crucial-to-the-defeat-of-apartheid

Vote

Not sure yet? Read more ↑

Discuss

This page was last edited on Friday, 25 Sep 2020 at 07:45 UTC

Explore related arguments