argument top image

How do we think about cancel culture? Show more Show less
Back to question

In June 2020, cancel culture claimed its latest victim: the popular children's television show Paw Patrol. People claimed that its protagonists - animated dogs who operate as police in a fictional universe - were being derided. These pieces said critics saw its positive portrayal of law enforcement strengthened a culture of deference to the police. Headlines around the world stated cancel culture had gone mad. But none of this was true. What began as a joke about cancel culture had grown into a conspiracy tearing across the internet. This crisis underpinned the bigger picture: anyone can be cancelled, and it has gone so far it can reach the international news without questioning. In recent years, the practice of withdrawing support for public figures who hold controversial views has exploded. And not just amongst the cartoons. Michael Jackson, JK Rowling, Louis CK, Woody Allen: the list of its celebrity victims is growing. The boom has divided opinion. Some believe it is a form of online activism that helps the marginalised hold the powerful to account. Their opponents see it as a devastating attack on civil liberties. So, what are the pros and cons of cancel culture?

Cancel culture is a myth Show more Show less

This approach argues that society is always changing, and culture adapts with it. Cancel culture has not emerged from historical power relationships. It has grown out of internet culture, produced by changing public attitudes.
< (2 of 3) Next position >

Cancel culture typifies the snowflake mentality

Cancel culture is just one element of the ongoing millennial campaign for a more anodyne world. Injustice exists.

The Argument

Cancel culture is just one element of the ongoing millennial campaign for a more anodyne world. Injustice exists. Life can be difficult. And yet, millennials have become so sensitive to ideas they don't agree with, they can no longer understand complex issues through any lens other than their own. Identity politics is the cornerstone of this perspective. It is as Senator Tom Cotton said of the cancelling of a commencement address by Ivanka Trump, "If the snowflakes so offended by the idea of hearing from a White House advisor couldn't contain their emotions, they should have skipped the speech...Instead, they ruined it for everyone." [1]

Counter arguments



Rejecting the premises




Not sure yet? Read more ↑


This page was last edited on Friday, 18 Sep 2020 at 10:18 UTC

Explore related arguments